Ionic air purifiers derive from a variety of technologies, all of which contain a number of beneficial reactive agents that declare to clean the air we breathe. Manufacturers voluntarily publish test results to demonstrate the power of these reactive agents against harmful contaminants. air cleaner
Safety Initial – Beneficial Reactive Providers
Unfortunately, manufacturers are not as forthcoming with information on the harm to human tissue of users who are exposed to the reactive agents. The in-depth article dealing with this aspect is placed at EzineArticles. com.
Protection First Redux – Unintentional By-products
Manufacturers are also not forthcoming about the by-products of their technology. Unbeknownst to numerous users, all ionic home air purifiers technologies create by-products in addition to the beneficial reactive providers. They are really not deliberately produced tend to be simply unintended products as a result of current technological constraints.
Ozone, a component pollutant of smoke, is the most frequent of these by-products. Smog, which weighs such as a foggy cloud over some cities, is typically produced by the response of sunlight on auto emissions such as dangerous carbon monoxide. Ozone in smog is blamed for many ills.
Take note that this article is not really a discussion about ozone power generators, a class of air purifiers that deliberately produces ozone in high enough concentrations to eliminate air-borne contaminants. For instance, some hotels use ozone generator to remove tobacco smoke from rooms when they are being prepared for the next guest.
It is commonly accepted that ozone generators pose a risk to human tissue because ozone is an extremely reactive oxidizing agent. Even so, for some strange reason, ozone generators continue to be widely sold to home users as air purifiers. This kind of controversy probably warrants another round of in-depth research at a later time.
All Ionic Air Devices Produce Some Ozone Seeing as A Function
The target of this article is on ionic air devices that do not intentionally produce ozone. There is absolutely no question that all ionic home air purifiers technologies are currently powerless to completely eliminate ozone in the process of manufacturing their beneficial reactive agents, be they negative ions, bipolar ions or plasmacluster ions and so on. It is a question of how much ozone is produced as an unintended by-product and at which point it becomes unhealthy and harming to users of the ionic air purifier.
The majority of manufacturers emphasize that the ozone manufactured by their technology is low. Often, they claim that it is way below 50 parts per billion (ppb), a measure of ozone attentiveness commonly cited by various parties around the world. Interestingly, there is no established legislation, only recommendations, regulating that ionic air purifiers cannot produce ozone in excess of 60 ppb. This leads us to the next question.
Is Ozone Concentration In 50 ppb Safe?
This is actually the million dollar question in the multimillion dollar ionic home air purifiers industry.
It is an even more important question for users (who routinely have respiratory problems) of such purifiers since they may be doing harm to themselves after spending cash on what they consider to be beneficial to their health. It should also be of great concern to health government bodies because they are entrusted with placing safety standards that rule manufacturers and that users rely on when they use such equipment.
A single would assume that the 50 ppb limit was scientifically set by some authorities, either medical or governmental. Shockingly, this does indeed not seem to be as the case. In fact, a prominent environmentalist suggested that this limit was randomly set in the united states FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION (FDA) Amendment Act 1972 without the scientific basis. Yet, the 50 ppb figure is commonly cited, not simply by manufacturers of ionic home air cleaners but by health authorities around the globe as well.